TLF Research & the Lume

A summary of tryptophan-like fluorescence research underpinning continuous, real-time microbial water quality monitoring.

What is Tryptophan-Like Fluorescence?

Tryptophan-like fluorescence (TLF) is an optical water quality parameter centered on excitation/emission wavelengths of approximately 275/340 nm. It reflects concentrations of compounds with fluorescence characteristics similar to the amino acid tryptophan, which is associated with microbial activity and fecal contamination.

A positive relationship between TLF intensity and fecal indicator bacteria (FIB), particularly E. coli, has been demonstrated across groundwater, surface water, estuarine, and urban watershed contexts on multiple continents. This makes TLF a promising real-time proxy for microbial contamination risk—complementing or replacing traditional culture-based methods that require 24–48 hours for results.

60s

Instant Results

TLF sensors provide readings in 60 seconds, compared to 24–48 hours for traditional culture-based methods.

0.05 ppb

Detection Limit

The Lume sensor's minimum detection limit for tryptophan dissolved in deionized water.

10 CFU

E. coli Sensitivity

Minimum detection limit of the correlation to E. coli present in wastewater effluent (per 100 mL).

Why TLF Matters

Microbial water quality is most frequently assessed using E. coli as a risk indicator. However, relying exclusively on culture-based E. coli measurement is limiting: it is slow, expensive, requires trained personnel, and captures only a single point in time. Risk assessments can be significantly improved by integrating TLF as a complementary, continuously monitored parameter.

Advantages Over Traditional Methods

No Reagents Required

TLF sensing is purely optical. No consumables, reagents, or lab infrastructure needed for each measurement.

Higher Precision

In Kenya groundwater studies, TLF sampling showed 14% average relative percent difference between duplicates, compared to ≥26% for culture-based methods.

Continuous Monitoring

Sensors can operate autonomously for months, capturing short-duration contamination events that weekly grab samples miss.

More Precautionary

Research in Malawi showed TLF indicates broader contamination risk than microbial culturing, making it a useful high-level screening tool.

Dramatically Lower Cost

For the cost of a single lab-processed grab sample, a TLF sensor can deliver thousands of in-situ microbial estimates over weeks to months of continuous deployment.

Cross-Environment Versatility

TLF has been validated across groundwater, freshwater rivers, chlorinated piped systems, and saline coastal environments on multiple continents, with studies spanning Kenya, Malawi, the US, and France.

Known Limitations

TLF cannot be used as a direct proxy for E. coli on an individual sample basis. The TLF signal can be influenced by dissolved organic carbon (DOC), humic-like fluorescence (HLF), turbidity, and temperature. Standardization of TLF thresholds associated with different risk levels remains an active area of research. Performance is best in groundwater, which typically has low DOC, consistent temperature, and negligible turbidity.

How the Lume Advances TLF

The Virridy Lume addresses many of the limitations identified in the TLF literature by coupling optical TLF sensing with machine learning models that account for environmental confounders. Rather than relying on static TLF thresholds, the Lume's algorithm adapts to site-specific conditions.

>94%

Categorical Accuracy

Site-specific calibrated categorical classifications of microbial contamination risk.

75%+

Linear Accuracy

Out-of-the-box accuracy on a continuous scale across 0–1,000 CFU/100 mL.

7%

Log-Scale Error

Mean absolute percentage error in log-transformed concentration space vs. culture-based methods.

Key Innovations

Machine learning quantification: Unlike earlier TLF sensors that report relative fluorescent units, the Lume quantifies actual E. coli concentrations. The ML model was validated across freshwater and coastal environments, including saline settings where enterococci are the regulatory indicator.

Multi-parameter correction: Built-in turbidity and temperature sensors allow the algorithm to correct for environmental interference that confounds raw TLF readings.

Drinking water performance: Binary classification at regulatory thresholds (1 and 10 CFU/100 mL) achieves 91–92% overall accuracy with Cohen's kappa of 0.82–0.84, indicating strong agreement with laboratory classifications.

Ocean transferability: In initial ocean deployments, the Lume achieved over 76% categorical accuracy using just six training samples, demonstrating transferability across microbial indicators and water matrices.

TLF Research Timeline

2015

Baker et al. demonstrate in-situ tryptophan-like fluorescence as a real-time indicator of faecal contamination in drinking water supplies. (Water Research)

2018

Sorensen et al. evaluate TLF as a measure of microbial contamination risk in Kenyan groundwater across 37 water points. (Sci. Total Environ.)

2018

Khamis et al. establish real-time detection of faecally contaminated drinking water with TLF, defining threshold values. (Sci. Total Environ.)

2020

Bedell, Sharpe, Purvis, Brown & Thomas demonstrate low-cost TLF sensor concepts for fecal exposure detection. (Sustainability) • Virridy

2020

Nowicki et al. conduct a nine-month monitoring program in Malawi, finding TLF is a more precautionary risk indicator. (Sci. Total Environ.)

2022

Bedell, Harmon, Fankhauser, Shivers & Thomas field-validate a continuous in-situ fluorescence sensor coupled with ML. 83% accuracy. (Water Research) • Virridy

2025

Multiple groups evaluate TLF for combined sewer overflow watersheds and estuarine systems. (Sci. Total Environ.; ACS ES&T Water)

2026

Knopp, Klaus, Wilson et al. advance continuous in-situ quantification with Lume V1.2 sensor design and multi-site validation. (EarthArXiv) • Virridy

2026

Demaree, Fankhauser, Cole, Ross & Thomas develop sensor-informed predictive models for TOC and nutrients on the Upper Yampa River. (ES&T Water) • Virridy

Key External TLF Research

Baker, A., Cumberland, S., Bradley, C., et al. (2015)
Water Research
Foundational TLF
Sorensen, J.P.R., et al. (2018)
Science of the Total Environment, 622–623, 1236–1244
Groundwater
Khamis, K., et al. (2018)
Science of the Total Environment
Threshold Definition
Nowicki, S., et al. (2020)
Science of the Total Environment, 750, 141284
Screening Tool
Science of the Total Environment (2025)
Science of the Total Environment
Urban Watershed

Virridy Publications

Demaree, Fankhauser, Cole, Ross, Thomas (2026)
ES&T Water
Virridy
Bedell, E.; Sharpe, T.; Purvis, T.; Brown, J.; Thomas, E. (2020)
Sustainability, 12, 3768
Virridy
Using Feedback to Improve Accountability in Global Environmental Health and Engineering
Thomas, E., Brown, J. (2020)
Environmental Science and Technology
Virridy

Virridy Patents

DMRV Fusion Networks
Thomas et al., US Patent-Pending (2023)
Family: Drinking Water Treatment, In-Stream Water Quality, Wildfire Impact, Water Quality Prediction & Variability Attribution
Alarm Threshold Microbial Fluorimeter and Methods
Bedell, E., Fankhauser, K., Sharpe, T., Wilson D., Thomas, E.
US Patent 11,506,606 B2 — Nov 22, 2022
Machine Learning Techniques for Improved Water Service Delivery
Wilson, D., Coyle, J., Thomas, E., Croshere, S.
US Patent 11,507,861 B2 — Nov 22, 2022
System and Methods for Operating a Microcomputer in Sleep-Mode and Awake-Mode
Fleming, M., Spiller, K., Thomas, E.
US Patent 10,564,701 — Feb 18, 2020
Distributed Low-Power Monitoring System
Thomas, E., Fleming, M.
US Patent 9,077,783 B2 — July 7, 2015